Moments pass, l spend them contemplatively while shadows of the past flit across my future. Whichever way I look, there's history to it. Those histories can do things, they can leave their taste on the tongue many, many years after their moment is gone. Desire, despair, desire, so many monsters.... With all I've learned, I surely should be good at this by now. But me, I'm on my own, as all things can be said to be; like the little flock of egrets on the landing bar above (which might not even be there if you're looking at a phone), life can freeze into a snapshot of experience that is non-existent, having been and gone save only the traces set upon it by the mind, the mind that files as it flies. Retrocausality gives us room for manoeuvre in all those perspectives we hold so dear, but it doesn't change the circumstance we once were called to face. The future holding as much sway as the past only means that our doorway to it is less nebulous than one might think; 'feeling our way' into a future we might want means letting go of the history rope just enough to move forward. The next point of arrival will probably prove us right - the number of times I've been through a phase only to surmise that in order to reach the milestone I got to, that phase was necessary. Freedom or entrapment may be cast into doubt either way, for who are we to question the orchestration of planetary destiny? Not to say we didn't have a hand in it collectively - a million species on the list of extinctions laid squarely at our door is nothing to be proud of. Yet still there are some who want nothing more than a head on a wall to be proud of, never mind their contribution to global desecration. We all have our own course to follow. But hey, there's no fun in that - it's just a sobering situation we need to be aware of in laying claim to any sense of responsibility at all. The weight of these impacts on Earth is going to have a bearing on us - no getting away from being part of the planet. While doing our damndest to beat off negativity, we might find that the horrors being inflicted on the world are pushing waves at us with the power of the moon over tides, for we are living at a time when Apocalyptic change is imminent and it isn't sensible to assume we're going to bypass the effects, whoever we are and however much we think we've got. Your life, my life, their lives all depend on energy for the way in which they're lived, the best energy being hard to find and positivity perpetually challenged by negativity's penchant for turning a perspective on a sixpence. The Now isn't holding a banner over your head to single you out in any way, it's here for you, for your eyes only, just as the synchronicities flitting across your timeline relate only to your thought track, nobody else's, and we still have no idea how synchronicity operates. Working with what we have, with what we know, there is space to consider our given time anew, and find appreciation of Now more often, whatever we happen to be doing with it. There's no-one keeping score on your positivity ticks. While you taste the difference, though, those you love will be glad of it too. When the value we can place on the Now equals the value we place on the things we have, perhaps we can begin - that's an anagram for Being and I've only just noticed, in all my 56 years of being alive it's never occurred to me that Begin and Being share all their letters ... - Perhaps we can begin being true to more than the sum of collectable parts.
0 Comments
"Resonance" conjures good vibration. We might read something we resonate with that connects us to the writer we've never met... if we don't resonate, we move on. In terms of sound, resonance is either a reverberation that fills a space or it's a resonant frequency. Thoughts and ideas with which we identify; for that moment we are pleased to share our mental space with another, to find a harmonic in the resonance we've found. As with so many things in human existence, we've adapted a word with scientific meaning and applied it to facets of personal realism. These harmonics we create seem to reverberate across the swathe of social media as in live gatherings of like-minded people. In fact these days we are more likely to find resonance in virtual reality via our phones, this cultural shift being a by-product of technological advancement and possibly the result of political agenda (not to be conspiracy-theorising, you understand). We know that social formats once prevalent (pubs, churches, local clubs etc.) have diminished to a fragment of what they once were, while dependence on technology has left us reliant on virtual social platforms. As a result, we've lost access to interpersonal skills we used to adopt in establishing resonance, like conversation and body language. Instead, we have to trust that what we see on the screen is real - that leaves us open to predation. Groups on social media are comparatively vast. Thousands flock to be part of movements with which they identify. And this is no bad thing, as we have to engage with each other somehow, co-creating a lift towards our evolution on a resonant thermal, riding a harmonic wave. We're in this together, even if we are taking baby steps against a tsunami seemingly determined to destroy. We're fighting for personal freedom while we chain ourselves to tech; that's either going to work for us or it's going to be our downfall. Resonance has an ebb and flow to it, harmonics are temporary things. We can't afford to fear change in questing to understand. Virtual reality is exactly that - almost, but not quite, real. Many things thought to be real rely on being imagined as real - quantum physics is full of this. We can learn a lot from those platforms, the thought forms that resonate, a harmony that comes from being part of something meaningful. But we have to stay true to our roots of Self where a note reverberates on the strings of our hearts. The brain doesn't know the difference between reality and imagination - to the mind, it's all the same. When virtual reality serves you well, all well and good. It is what it is - relationships exist. Or do they? "What is Innerstanding?" An interesting question. Understanding, we all know about, even if we fall short on it sometimes. A great review of its many colours can be found in the Cambridge Dictionary. What about Overstanding? There is indeed such a word, as defined online: overstand. Verb. (third-person singular simple present overstands, present participle overstanding, simple past and past participle overstood (rare) to stand or insist too much or too long; overstay. to stand too strictly on the demands or conditions of. There's another definition in the Urban Dictionary, varying somewhat from the above, and I quote: "The Distinction between Overstanding and Understanding is a matter of context and awareness. To overstand is to comprehend a thing itself AND to have knowledge of why it is the way it is and of its place or role in the grand scheme of things." This particular definition (in full) is a little challenged in grammatical English but makes a good read, so if you want the whole thing, diamonds and all, click here. So, is Innerstanding a word? When first contemplating the contents of this post, I didn't think it would be, but it is, and the spiritually minded will be pleased to read Urban Dictionary's definition here. Given the above, we have three points of consideration. Understanding, to trawl the depths of a person, problem, or situation and subsequently gain knowledge as to the underlying components of the aforesaid, as opposed to Overstanding when we outstay a welcome on our verbosity, presence or limitations. Or conversely, to perhaps overthink it all somewhat. On being presented with the question, my thoughts turned instantly to wave forms, the peaks and troughs and wells between. Bearing in mind that reality is a continuously shifting sandscape, and that each moment offers a different context to the last, we are nevertheless given to understand - to reach the depths of the matter and form a view from there. To overstand - to see it from above, and be either pious or over-reaching in resultant appraisal. To innerstand - well, the definition given in the link above is very comprehensive. Innerstanding is where the whole picture creates the vista, and it would be a sorry oversight not to quote from the definition given; "absolute, heart-centred knowledge from the core inner being (Source). This word truly requires no description, as it is the zero point to knowledge and being. The knowing that all is perfect and happens for a reason (cause & effect) to move one towards learning and expansion." Zero point? My kind of language, describing the field where wave forms are unnecessary, the source of all energy, the well of infinite potential. The zero point field is well known to science, but difficult territory for mathematicians to tread (read why in Wikipedia), its elusive quality and breadth of implication making it a ready target for Woo Hunters (dressed in virtual khakis and posing in combat gear next to their latest Renormalised infinity) who'd be loading their weapons with arguments against Innerstanding, even with an Understanding of what the word is trying to say, for they would be Overstanding on their boxes of constants and constraints in determination to be Above All That which is Woo. On questing for self-discovery, Innerstanding would surely stand us in good stead, were we to have more of it, methinks, and to reach that point wherein the definition lies would be to appreciate the scale of our part in the play, to see beyond ourselves to where all may be illuminated, if only for a moment. For it has to be said that if we understand, we are doing well, and if we overstand, we are dwelling too long, while our Innerstanding may be short-lived but valuable, a hefty contribution to our vision of What Is, and our collective creation of that which may, fate willing in a fair wind, come to pass. The quantum trail inevitably leads to new information from unexpected sources, and tonight's search for links regarding time waves (Advanced and Retarded) fetched up a paper of considerable interest. Antonella Vannini is a PhD student in Rome who's obviously thinking outside the box about Time. In his paper http://www.hessdalen.org/sse/program/Antonella.pdf you'll find reference to Luigi Fantappie, whose work on quantum mechanics and Special Relativity in 1941 led to his coining of the term Syntropy, the retrocausal symmetry of Entropy, in which events are propagated in the future prior to reaching the present. This is as opposed to the entropic tendency for reality to appear as if all things lead inevitably to an irreversible state of chaos (as when a glass smashes on the floor, and cannot regenerate itself back to the entire state it once possessed). A state of entropy is determined (by most scientists at the time of writing) to be absolute in the evolution of the Universe, which is postulated to become, eventually, a discordant soup of sludgy brown material without any particular form. The article behind the image above says otherwise. Vannini refers (in his fascinating essay) to the EPR Paradox (the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox you can find described in this link), relating to quantum entanglement and the apparent breach of speed-of-light limits set out in the Terms of General Relativity. Its resolution is achieved by application of the d'Alambert operator, which allows for both Advanced and Retarded wave forms to take part in the entangled process and thereby, per se, the creation of reality. When the d'Alambert operator is applied to Schoedinger's wave equation (which applies time ((to collapse of the wave function)) in the classical forward-arrow format), the EPR paradox ceases to take mathematical effect, because the speed-of-light problem, if Time intersects the respondent mechanism from past and future points simultaneously, ceases to exist. All states of superposition are allowed at all times, and no 'hidden variables' (as in Bell's Theorem) need apply. No problem. What we're seeing here, if you see these things as I do, is a cast-iron case for a retrocausal Universe, and the store we set in the idea of 'creating our own reality' is hinged entirely on the concept of causal/retrocausal entanglement. If all states allowable within any given parameter (situation) are superpositioned (i.e. open to all options being available), the Multiverse must also play its part in supplying the multitude of options into which Reality (the wave form) at any given moment may fall (collapse). The collapse of the wave function (referred to in both the above links, so no need for another one here but you can have Wiki's anyway) is said to occur through the medium of observation, but this assumption is itself going to fall under a sticky wicket when you consider, across Multiversal perambulation, the sheer volume of Observers at work in the equation. Now, we know from experience that absolutely nothing ever happens exactly as we imagine it will. We also know that our focus has a bearing on outcome - that positive and negative considerations on any event yet to materialise (and within the context of this discussion, on past events also) have some impact on the actuality of that event when it finally finds its way into the material timeline, Entropy and Syntropy notwithstanding. We fear the worst, likely we'll get something close. We hope for the best, and while we can be disappointed, we probably escaped the worst-case scenario. The best is often saved for last, when we expected no such thing. Leading the way, the way we feel as if blinded by the light at the end of the tunnel, is our old friend Synchronicity, who's probably related to Syntropy. Without claiming a Theory of Everything in the making here, I'd go so far as to suggest that we are closer to defining how our reality is constructed than perhaps we've ever been in the history of (this particular) civilisation. We didn't expect half of what we got in the outcomes we've been delivered so far, but we might see some patterns emerging, and could be making sense of suggestions that point to the hand we have in our own versions of What Happens Next. There are people like me who prefer not to grab the tiller, and would rather leave outcomes to those (residing most likely in other dimensions) who know more about what constitutes 'Highest Greatest Good'. There are others who swear by the Law of Attraction, and others (probably not reading my Blogs) who think this is all a load of Woo. UPDATE 2020 - Come and join the Group for Live Videos on Mondays, and more discussion with others who think about this kind of thing... Whether or if the glass is half-full, the balance of symmetry allows it also to be half-empty; whichever way you look at it, there are more forces at work than ourselves in making good the evolution of the Universe. Maybe we should be asking ourselves what to fill the glass with by now. We are quantum, being small enough, and we have therefore the same capabilities as all those quantum particles up there in Syntropy. Let's fill our boots back in the Garden, where we were before we knew we knew Too Much of Not Enough. Bring on the Spice Girls..... or just spend a few minutes in suspended disbelief.... Even before quantum mechanics and entanglement first saw the light of human day around 1925, scientists have condemned those who dare to see things differently, and as quantum mechanics has become more fascinating to the world at large, their protective nets have tightened. Brian Cox attacked those with views on Uncertainty other than his own as 'charlatans'. But there's been a development. Entanglement was born in the equations of Schroedinger and Bohr; it was more recently the subject of experiment and became an accepted concept, although Einstein never liked this 'spooky action at a distance'. Essentially, it's the capability of particles to respond interactively with each other regardless of measurable distance between them. Last year a study on quasars pulled more evidence out of the cosmos on the extent of this phenomenon. But scientists still argue that it can't apply to us as living organisms, because we are 'too complex' and after all, talking about quantum mechanics and human beings in the same sentence is just Woo. That is, until now. Suddenly a group of researchers working on luminescent proteins have breached the wall of constraint. Organisms can become entangled, by means of absorbing, emitting and reabsorbing photons. They're soon to be moving the concept on with entangled Tardigrades. So this new evidence takes another brick from the wall, which before long will inevitably tumble, allowing us to finally live in peace with the fact that we are entangled with other Selves and Particles to greater or lesser degrees, because we can freely admit that Light and Energy are the same thing, and we absorb, emit and reabsorb these energies across the non-local divide all the time. We can afford to get excited about this. Proof that we directly experience entanglement pushes us to focus on responsibility in ways we may have been reluctant to accept. We really do have to be careful with our thoughts. Up to us how we handle the thoughts and emotions we absorb from others, and what we emit as a result of that absorption. For those with whom we are entangled won't always see things the way we do. We still have judgement and ego, issues and histories to absolve and diminish in our move towards new paradigms in living life as we know it. We are complex, after all. We do have time, and where there's a will there's a way, but we have first to accept these strange phenomena as part and parcel of present physiology, and to refine our psychology in alignment with approaches that actually work, replacing traditional approaches that have, let's face it, not done us many favours so far. This is a major revelation. Not only for the barriers to scientific progress promised to be breached, but for the initiation of wider thought on matters of quantum mechanics relative to the human condition. There are a lot of new-age protagonists out there who put 'Quantum' in the title of their church, webpage, seminar or world tour without any real exploration of what this actually means, with no explanation of how the science works in relation to the esoterics they are expounding. Wouldn't it be great if we could bring new science into the field of vision without the traditional barriers of condemnation and contempt, and begin to corroborate personal experience with cutting-edge discoveries which make sense of our placement in spacetime, our relationship with the Universe and with each other, and our growth process as we continue our quest for what dreams may come of being the Beings we really and truly would love to be? What would be left for us to argue about? Physics has it that things have to be destroyed in order for new things to be created. As physics has laws we are all but forced to abide by, this fact alone is enough to tempt a second guess as to what we're doing here. If creating new paradigms is your thing, then it's going to be important to understand your power. The power of an electron in doing what it does is phenomenal, so scaling things up to our size, we've got some catching up to do. There's nothing more powerful than the power of thought, and nothing anyone can do to stop that being so. We're living in an era which needs change like yesterday on a planet that's powerless to stop what's going on, short of a major tantrum like a volcano or a tsunami from the Arctic - we do know about the ice floes melting. Female minds and male minds are very different things, with different kinds of logic in their circuitry. We're getting tested, if my feeling is right, on how to manage this differential in what we accept versus what's become pet, in terms of our habitual thinking. We've got aeons and eons of time to back-engineer into something that makes sense to us now, and our trains of thought have really got to be things we don't wreck any more. If you're having a really hard time coming to terms with the fabric of your relationships, you're not alone. This last few years has been shambolic in terms of understanding, even though we've tried. We've tried really hard to make sense of what's been going on in our worlds, while our reality seems to be shifting into something it always was, that looks very different from this side of the l=timeline. Despair not, there's a lot at stake. We didn't choose any of this, you know. If your life and that of others seems a million miles apart, there's still a reason you're connected to them, and you didn't set about to be so connected, so that puts you in the same boat as the rest of us. These ships we sail had best be heading in the same direction. Because if they are, and we're supposed to be understanding what Love means through all these dark nights and unromantic tantrums, we still have a chance to become coherent. The male and female mind can meld to the extent that we know for sure our telepathic bonds exist, and without much effort these points of connection can become time-dependent, as the cycles of the day dictate, so that thinking the same kind of things becomes natural to us, safe and acceptable, whereupon distance doesn't matter. And when we reach beyond that point in our tiny little punts, the world will change - our matrix will make it so, because it can't not, and we can do this, because we can. All links of interest are behind the pics. They are where the pics are from... as are the memories we needed for the lesson. We all fall one way or another. We fall in love, we fall from grace, we fall into 'states'. But what is falling? And why do we use that term? The story of The Fall is convoluted. Biblically, an Archangel fell from hierarchy on purporting to take the place of God. Subsequently turning into a serpent, tempting Eve to fall from her position of purity and take Adam down along with her. The Archangel concerned was, among other things, known as the Bringer of Enlightenment, and while the Tree of Knowledge was the one sporting the fatal apple, the Tree of Life was central to the force of existence. Once privy to the Knowledge bestowed by the fruit of said Tree, we (humans) came to know the difference between good and evil, which we didn't know before. One train of thought associates the serpent with salvation. That's ecclesiastical argument for you. Electrons, the particles which govern the energetic properties of atoms, rise and fall in 'shells'. The lower the energy level, the lower the shell. Gravitationally, that is, as the nucleus of the atom carries its own gravity. As this differential depends on photons (particles of light), clearly the more energy our atoms possess, the more light is involved in the equation. Our 'state' may depend directly on the amount of light within our atomic structure, explaining why a positive disposition feels lighter than a negative disposition, which feels 'heavy'. A positive outlook contributes to our ability to do things, to sense clearly, to view with optimism. A heavy heart, on the other hand, leads to inertia, confusion and a tendency towards cynicism. In line with the wave equation familiar in quantum physics, we move through these states temporarily, with corresponding peaks and troughs. Nothing is forever, after all. When we fall, we inevitably get up again. Some say that 'Quantum' is just a trendy word bandied about for effect. Yet the quantum relationship to our states of being is evident - knowledge of basic quantum mechanics is essential to our understanding of many effects we encounter on our journey through life. Knowing about positron annihilation allows us to appreciate what is happening when we are full of positive energy, feeling good and moving forward. Creating photons in the process, we correspondingly become 'light', and other people recognise this, describing our disposition in such a state as 'sunny', 'bright', and 'glowing'. In certain situations, we can maintain a sunny disposition for a long time, but inevitably we must eventually drop back to a less vibrant version of being in order to avoid 'burning out'. So when we fall, in whatever context, it's important to bear in mind the temporary nature of all things, including our own states, and having been attributed with Knowledge, we can only build upon what we know and learn more as we go along. Mistakes are part of the human nature, and we seek to avoid their repetition - sometimes the degree of effort involved causes us to repeat them anyway, but there's always another chance. Take your knowledge with you and put it to good use - there's no effort involved in trust. We may be free to do as we wish, but we're unable to dictate what will happen in life, or to control what others do in the course of their own path. Accepting the flow of circumstantial duality may prove a challenge in the face of our traditional teachings, the pressure to 'succeed', the temptation to excel, the fear of failure. Yet we know, at heart, that acceptance is essential, and perhaps the strongest foundation for our natural ability to find purpose in the challenges we face. Scientists say the Uncertainty Principle is simply a case of not being able to take two measurements at the same time. Brian Cox called anyone who thought differently a "purveyor of tripe" . We are all unique - every grain of sand and snowflake being unique, has this nothing to do with Uncertainty? Seems likely to be a connection in there, and Heisenberg might even agree. Electrons are fuzzy things, not pinpointable because they zing their way round and through several dimensions at once and somehow land up here in this Universe just long enough to fend off the pesky Positrons. So not being able to pin down an electron, which is where this whole uncertainty-principle thing first started, is one thing. Not being able to pin down anything at all is, tbh, more like it. One life as we know it, Jim - all else is conjecture but it's good to know about Uncertainty. Where would we be without the U.P.? Here's a microtubule in the brain, best as we can picture it - this is the one place in the body you'll find coherent water, the incredible properties of which you can learn about behind the pic. Unless you're feeling really scientific, in which case you're going to love this... Look at the bigger picture - the Multiverse. Almost everyone now agrees with Everett, now that quantum mechanics has proved so many dimensions and variables to exist. That's a lot of Universes, mind, and a lot of options, probably stretching to Infinity if we could bring ourselves to face it, but Renormalisation is easier so..... back to the comfort zone. What for? Who doesn't want to know how to get the best out of what they've got? Time - on our side, with the Past and Future waves of Advance and Retard crashing into the Present at the same time and hey, doesn't it suddenly make sense that we're crazy, clever and making mistakes while we're waking up to Now and what we can do with it, somewhere our species hasn't really been before. At least not in living memory. Behind the bubbles you'll find Quanta Magazine saying much the same thing. What if we, like the electron, are buzzing in and out of Multiversal states all the time, without realising it? How can every thing be unique without infinite proportions to choose from? And that, extrapolated into our neural framework, means that we are freer to choose or not to choose than we were before, because knowing that both are necessary for our movement through Time allows us the pleasure of appreciation, the feeling of what it is to be happy with yourself, instead of beating ourselves up and crashing back into the pan of Past/Future Anxiety where everything loses its own plot. The simplest things are binary, 1 and 0 making a code that replicates itself and can do so in infinite combinations any way anything wants it to, from computer programming to barcodes in simple versions of the way we do things. Binary suffices all requirements of data, and a lot of things in Nature tend to follow it - the fuzzy improbabilities of the electron and the probability that this table will still be here in the morning have some kind of relationship. They either are (1), or they are not (0). If we can be in so many places at once then why shouldn't identical snowflakes fall where no-one is watching them, and identical grains of sand appear in remote corners of the world where they can't be found? Commonality is the thing in the rarity of symmetry, because Nature is not fond of symmetry and scientists have long hated that. Back to Charnia, where the lions and witches had us wondering about our wardrobes..... but if you want Wiki's take it's right there behind the picture, where Life first began to take Form.... You've heard it said that we're made of this material, quarks and electrons, that atoms are the stuff of life - in due service to Relativity it seems fair to surmise that Micro and Macro correspond with each other. Over many arguments with physicists looms the division between our existence (in the large, macro world) and that of the quarks and electrons that comprise our bodily matter. If we're made of this stuff, then why don't we behave like it, just as the solar system behaves like an atom? Quoting the Quora page linked to the picture, “Every time someone says that the Universe (or even a star system, or a galaxy) is like a big atom, a cosmologist dies a bit inside”; so it is that scientists want to keep their compartments separated by all kinds of b*lls*it to make it look as though nobody could get the hang of it without a traditional Masters degree. The nucleus of the atom sits deep inside its compound, guarded by a ring-fence of electrons occupying 'shells'. Electrons rise and fall within this shell-system by absorbing and losing photons. If a source of energy (light) 'excites' the atom, electrons within it can climb to a higher shell, only to fall back to their original state in a short space of time. Of course, a short space of time for an electron might be much longer than we give credit for under the auspices of relativity, given that lifetimes are variable on this planet and a year for us is as an hour for a butterfly. Let's say, for argument's sake, that we are like atoms (and solar systems, just to kill off a bit of a cosmologist) with a nucleus at the centre of Self, where resides that part of us unknown to others and barely acquainted with our own mind, where science and psychology break down - our Singularity. Then let's say that the electrons are as our states, which exist in 'shells' of positive and negative. Emotional states are sometimes described in terms of 'frequency', where a 'higher vibrational state' means more of a positive feeling. I feel this to be a bit of a misnomer, but I could well be wrong. It might indeed be that occupying a higher vibrational field corresponds to feeling good. Whatever it means, and wherever the analogy comes from, it sounds a bit like subatomic structure to me. In these terms we're looking at now, we can see a correlation between the structure of an atom and the structure of our Selves, from the essence of our being to the mental state we occupy. There's a lot of space between the nucleus of an atom and the electron shells around it. This example uses a baseball to illustrate the effect. In our analogy, the space between the core of the Self and the responses / reactions to stimuli we experience in relation to the outside world could be occupied by something we find very elusive. Scientists might find Dark Matter or Energy lurking around the space inside atoms, so let's suppose we have something equally mysterious filling the gap for us. We might call it the ID. The Yid? Let's settle for Ego. Everything that lives must surely have one. Without it, there would be no drive to make the most of circumstance, to ascend within a pack, to take on bigger prey, or to be inventive with ways to obtain food. The natural world could not exist without ego. This would mean that the state we occupy in subatomic terms corresponds to positive or negative feelings as regulated by the ego, the energy of the space in between inner and outer selves, and the incoming stimulus of the situation. Stepping up to the plate really means stepping up to the shell, and we only have to be confident in doing this - positrons gain ground when we make light work of it. Ego is only a bad thing when it smothers everything else, like too much ketchup on your breakfast. Sometimes we feel as though we've learned enough - what more can these shells do for us? Surely we've got to have dreams and follow them, otherwise we wouldn't be true to our star, or stars as the astrologers would have it, for starseeds we all are.... it's not a cultivated cult. We come from the same stuff, you and I, and of the stuff we're made of pretty much all is the same thing, given the uniqueness quotient thanks to the uncertainty principle. Stuff the rhetoric, Brian Cox. You said it all. Just to recap on the diagram here. Electrons = Earthlings. Nucleus = Earth. Space (yellow?) = Ego. We can, if we want to, reach neutralisation, find a balance on the shell system and fit more easily with the balance of nature. Physically, our feet are usually touching the ground. As time shows us the truth of what we choose, and how little we get to do so, correspondence with natural law becomes more need-to-know. We know, now. The knowing is all around us. What do we do with what's next to come in on the current? Those who've followed my blogs over the last couple of years know pretty much all there is to know about my position in life, so I'll not be making this post specific to any group or collective for the content of this one is generic anyway, no need to count in any constraints. Unless you're really not into anything that could possibly be Woo, you'll know we have an electromagnetic field around our bodies which carries a frequency - sometimes we find ourselves on the same frequency as others and sometimes we find ourselves walking into an 'atmosphere', making us uncomfortable. When that happens, we want to leave. Or change the dynamic somehow. Negativity might breed negativity but we don't willingly lend ourselves to the partnership, it serves no purpose but to fuel more discord. When we are synchronised with a frequency, though, we enjoy the gravitation and often learn something from its existence. Put into context, we work well with people we resonate with and less well where there is less harmony. Use of the word 'harmony' illustrates a close connection between electromagnetism and music, with resonance and frequency also giving the game away a bit. If we veer into the current too far we get into the realms of currency.... nooooo These EM fields of ours could be seen as bubbles - when we interact with other EM fields we remain individual, much as a water bubble shares its contents while remaining a singular thing, making sense of the feelings we cross-reference with others and the non-physical communication that apparently takes place as when we feel strongly about a person before interacting with them. Or know another's mind from a distance. Not only that, but we are also proving to ourselves - and each other by default of the above - that we can throw thoughts, feelings, and intuitions around without even being in direct contact, just by thinking about each other. The foam of our quantum units is excitable. Some of our relationships separate in the foam and drift apart, connecting with other bubbles of humanity. Some seem to maintain a connectivity, and those special ones find ways to throw things across the Universe at each other, perhaps because they've been here before and learned how to do this, but due to the strange loss of memory that separates lifetimes, we're having to learn it all over again. We find ourselves connecting with minds like our own, more and more often, and cross-referencing our experiences so that we can make sense of them - varying perspectives making for soluble solutions. Solving the mysteries of the Universe isn't a privilege confined to physicists, it's as much a matter of where the information's given, and to whom, and who shares it, who takes it on board, who wants to know more. We find answers with questions hot on their heels for us to get to grips with. The cycle doesn't end, for any of us, so let's agree that in quantum terms at least we are all equal, and some are only more equal than others if they think they are. I'd like to think we're putting it to good use, all this extra information we're getting from our deep dark relationships internally and externally, while still being able to celebrate the light and see the bright side as often as not. For being individuals we have a lot to share, every perspective being different making it important that we do. |
AuthorKathy is the author of Quantumology. She met up with quantum mechanics in 1997, pledging allegiance to its sources thereafter. These are her personal thoughts and testimonies. Archives
April 2023
|