You're probably here because you'd love to know how the quantum world translates to life and affects the way we live it. After a long break doing other things with Life, I've come back to Blog here because the time is upon us - change is urgently needed.

When I delivered my first course I'd no idea what to expect. All I knew was that the info piling up from research was pointing in one direction - towards self-management of quantum probabilities. Probability is key in the quantum world - it's like Uncertainty, only with potentials.

Uncertainty = a factor that rules out 'Law of Attraction' templates being one-size-fits-all. Advocates will tell you that wherever you concentrate your efforts of intent will deliver the desired outcome. What they fail to tell you is that honing in on a desired outcome also carries with it an associated necessity for curve-balls to ensure that the random element of chance (Uncertainty) has a hand in the proceedings. So some aspects of the vision you desperately wanted to materialise will almost certainly be things you didn't want at all. 

On the other hand, making Uncertainty a favourable commodity really isn't that difficult at all.

"The more conscious you are of input and processes, the more competence will appear in your output mechanism." So said a speaker recently, on speech, decisions and action.

We know that the brain has decided what we're going to do next before we are consciously aware of it. Entanglement or anomaly? Speed-of-light thing again? Surely not, just a glitch in the Matrix as everything is time-related... but only to us.

We are Observers. Everything is made of what we see.

Well, if only it were that simple. Nature is known to be cruel and the Universe doesn't do free lunches. But there's no need to be despondent, because physics, as usual, is on-side.

We're all unique, like every grain of sand and snowflake there ever was, and science won't even go there, let alone try to explain it.

In building 'quantum competencies' (terminology from the talk), there has to be account taken of a Bio Interface, one that connects reality and experience. "The Bio Revolution," said the speaker, "is underway."

Really? Wonder what that means in real-time-application speak. So now we have to ask ourselves where quantum mechanics has led us. Are we on the cusp of a surge in conscious advancement, or are we over the hill in terms of planetary destruction?

"Nature created you as a Transformer," the speaker went on. My notebook blazed with capitals.

I know something about transformers. They're made of wire coils round a juxtaposed core of E shaped metal things and the number of coils determines whether output and input voltages are going to be up or down from each other. The same number of turns on primary and secondary coils means input and output will stay the same, making the transformer nothing more than a break point in the proceeding charge of electrons doing their thing.

But they can get really complicated. Wires can be added in to the windings until the neat copper roll becomes a metallic hedgehog of current manipulators, sending out volts in various phase states according to what the bit of tech requires.

We are no different. Nature sends us streams of information and synchronicities to trust, follow and sometimes actively pursue, and how much energy we put into something is usually synergic with what we get out. Along the way, we have to decide at times how many spiky outputs and inputs we can possibly balance at our Core. And what Light's got to do - got to do with it.....

Most of what influences us is, in my experience, what you can't see. What you see is very surface, a 3D illusion of solidarity. But that's just a reflection of basic traits. What's underneath is a quark-gluon sea of perpetually shifting tides, changing who we are quite literally every day. Pick a month, any month, there on the right hand side; click and see what you turn up on the random throw of Einstein's quantum dice.

In this world of ever-pervading debauchery and political shufflings, we have every right to retain belief that we are conscious enough to make change happen, and it will, for it cannot help itself .... timing is everything, they say.


www.kathyratcliffe.space

If we consider the light cone, which looks like this:
​

...and consider that the light cone is carrying Advanced and Retarded waves at the same time (i.e., both past and future waves), the Present we are given as particle reality (gee, thanks Universe...) is crafted by the Higgs Boson (which dictates scale) and forces (like gravity, for instance) that hold things together in one place.

These three dimensions of Time are appealing constructs of Reality, explaining Superposition being a feature of wherever we are - 'any number of permutations as to which light cone we might fall into next' sounds more plausible to me than "superposition isn't part of our everyday life at all". 

The article Phys.Org has just brought out (linked below) is on point, me thinks, in pointing out that the "something that's wrong in the Standard Model" has something to do with Gravity, its relationship with Light and how/why/when they are weaving a merry dance around our sensory perceptions to make us think a 'spacetime continuum' is actually real.

Lol...

phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dimensions-space-secondary-effect.html

Please share your thoughts in the comments. Thank you ...

Reading a book by one Sylvan Muldoon called Projection of the Astral Body, it's clear that this person has considerable experience in the act of astral projection. He spent months in a bed-bound state of unwellness ensuring that his knowledge was preserved; people in this kind of situation are not prone to fabrications. Published in 1929, it is nevertheless still in print and available should you wish to read it. The language is quaintly antiquated but the many references to what would nowadays be easily construed as quantum-mechanical operations are startling. 

In that same year Peter Higgs was born along with Murray Gell-Mann, founders of the Higgs Boson and Quarks respectively. In their infancy, of course, no knowledge of bosons or 'virtual particles' such as gluons was present - this is what the Periodic Table looked like back then. The founding fathers (Max Planck, Neils Bohr, Rutherford et al) were just beginning to explore the hidden depths of photons and in 1925 were publishing ground-breaking studies on quanta. Hot on the heels of 'atomic theory', they were postulating incredible truths and in some cases laying themselves open to peer persecution (said to have contributed to Ludwig Boltzmann's suicide in 1906, his theories forerunning much of what was now becoming acceptable). Wolfgang Pauli, subject to mental fragilities himself, sought assistance from Carl Jung and together they opened the gates for scientific exploration of Synchronicity, publishing The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche in 1952 although the possibility (or otherwise) of experimental evidence prevented them from gaining much ground at the time.

Nevertheless, the ground they did cover has resonance in Muldoon's book. In Wikipedia's article on Synchronicity, we may read that,
All the events in a man's life would accordingly stand in two fundamentally different kinds of connection: firstly, in the objective, causal connection of the natural process; secondly, in a subjective connection which exists only in relation to the individual who experiences it, and which is thus as subjective as his own dreams.
— Arthur Schopenhauer, "Transcendent Speculation on the Apparent Deliberateness in the Fate of the Individual", Parerga and Paralipomena (1851), Volume 1, Chapter 4, trans. E. F. J. Payne

These mysteries of the universal state, then, have remained subject to scientific deliberation and uncertainty for some considerable length of time.

Muldoon describes a deeper level of consciousness which he terms "superconsciousness', accessed by the astral at all times but only manifesting through our conscious Will at times of great stress, when mothers can lift cars to free trapped children. Described by Wiki writers as 'hysterical strength', their paper linked here lists many examples. Ascribing immense power to this version of deeply hidden Will, Muldoon alludes to the phenomenon we now commonly describe as the 'law of attraction', another area of potential which most of the human race appears to leave untapped.

He also wonders at the extreme capabilities of the astral body in mechanics, form and motion, all of which we may now ascribe to quantum principles. As the uncertainty of our world increases in threat and predilection for self-destructive tendencies, a review of these inherent capacities potentially within us all is, in this author's opinion, somewhat overdue.

Readers may note that it's over a year since my last contribution here. I can only put this down to pressures of life, demotivating circumstances and troublesome times which, if I may be so bold as to trust linkage to the abundance of the Universe, is moving out of phase to make room for more productive days. Should you find yourself similarly swamped, you have my condolences and I wish you every resounding success in the era of advancements yet to come.

Image credit; Pacific Standard

Image credit :   Adelaide University

'You might have been here before, or this site may be new to you. Either way, you'd probably love to know how the quantum world translates to life and affects the way we live it.
When I delivered my first course I'd no idea what to expect. All I knew was that the info piling up from research was pointing in one direction - towards self-management of quantum probabilities. Probability is key in the quantum world - it's like Uncertainty, only with potentials.

Uncertainty = a factor that rules out 'Law of Attraction' templates being one-size-fits-all. Advocates will tell you that wherever you concentrate your efforts of intent will deliver the desired outcome. What they fail to tell you is that honing in on a desired outcome also carries with it an associated necessity for curve-balls to ensure that the random element of chance (Uncertainty) has a hand in the proceedings. So some aspects of the vision you desperately wanted to materialise will almost certainly be things you didn't want at all. 
​

People who take part in my courses work collaboratively to change a collective mindset. They find keys in course content that apply to their own lives, and discover how to use them - knowing in advance that the key will fit the door. The uniqueness of the key, as with all keys, ensures that their application is personal and stays that way - they don't need to share their experiences with anyone else. Instead, they choose to share generic thought tracks, which serve to strengthen a resolve to overcome difficulties together with the assurance that it can be done. The only way to cultivate sustainable positivity is to invest knowledge of personal systems into the project, and to see evidence of this approach paying off for other people; this is first-hand experiential evidence in a 'live' situation, and frankly nothing  comes closer in terms of proof.

More often than not, someone soon comes out with the statement, "I had no idea that others felt like this too." Which in itself holds a key, does it not, proving the generic element has as much to do with feeling as it does with trains of thought.
Understanding where a feeling comes from is the secret to unlocking trap doors. With the help of collaborative energy, a negative culture turns into a positive one because those trap doors then remain forever unlocked. The same people who were guarding negative processes like down-time and blame-driven action (silo mentality, responsibility resistance) lose the sense of protectiveness in feeling that there was some benefit to be gained from maintaining such behaviour. They lose the sense of righteousness concerning that approach because they finally get to see the benefits of doing things differently, of sharing in positive outcomes, and ultimately of feeling good about coming to work every day. In Testimonials (the page is linked below) you'll find plenty of examples - people expressing surprise at just how much has been achieved personally and collectively.

Sustainability is a feature of Quantumology courses and to be honest I am amazed myself at how reliably this proves to be true. This week I had an email from a Headteacher who took part in a course at his school - you can read his words on this page. Almost a decade after the course was delivered, staff have not looked back and results have spoken for themselves ever since.

When I walk the dog, it's lovely to catch a sunset or see a hawk fly by, to hear skylarks proclaiming through the summer and listen to the trees whisper lullabies in autumn.  Coming home to a hot drink and warm company is lovely too. There are things in life that are not so lovely, and times when familiarity gets the better of contentment. Understanding duality, uncertainty, and principles of self-management in spacetime are among the components that make change work and keep it running without effort because sustainability is like perpetual motion - it does not need exertion of force to maintain momentum. Energy has a funny way of taking care of itself.

Trust me, I've only jumped in to claim this word. "Wavicle" is a word that could currently be construed as a component of 'word salad' or some kind of Woo by scientists of certain persuasions. Nevertheless, we need a new identity for quantum particles that are not particles, and are not waves either, but which can oscillate between the two when nobody is looking.

Presently the entry on Wikipedia is devoid of any definition. About time someone did something about that.

​

Let's see if it looks any different by the time you come to read this post.

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wavicle&redirect=no

The speed of Light is all very well. As a measurement, it's useful in gauging distance between stars and galaxies. But to say that nothing in the Universe can travel faster is a statement reminiscent of the age when the Earth was said to be the centre of the Galaxy, or the Solar System, or even at one point the centre of the Universe.

​We have a tendency to adopt a hugely inflated opinion of ourselves.

When that opinion comes crashing down to earth we don't much like the effects, so tend to avoid inviting such catastrophes. Sometimes, though, a catastrophe is unavoidable, much as the Ultraviolet Catastrophe was unavoidable in physics. When something absorbs/emits every frequency of everything that Is, something has to give. Constants might well be first in line.

We are constantly bemoaning things. The state of the planet, its governance, our failures in husbandry. Our lot, our position, our responsibility. We bemoan our health, potential, direction of progress and lack thereof. All we do, really, is moan. Perhaps we've been trained this way. Perhaps we're so accustomed to negativity in the news that the new normal is really not very far away from the old one, and we're kidding ourselves that things have changed.

Physics has the same problem. Look at any paper describing an equation and you'll see text that says something like, "If X equals Y then Z can be A, and B will be equivalent to C." Everything the maths tells us is coming from a place of safety, where symbols are sacred and the numbers don't really matter because it's all relative anyway, the solution a product of its own device.

This video slashes the speed of light into silos for further management, asking questions of the constant that even Max Planck might approve of. Where there's light, there are things to be seen. The trouble is, we can only ever see a tiny slice of the bigger picture.

The word 'Super' is all very well but when it precedes a description in physics it means something beyond the state of goodness we generally ascribe to the principle. Something that is 'superb' is a great thing, a positive thing, a thing of beauty. So it should be across the board, one would think, but in quantum mechanics 'Super' is relative, superlative not as an expression of praise, but more often one of despair.

The superlative qualities of the quantum realm are yet to be defined; including as they do Uniqueness and Entanglement, products of Uncertainty and Non-locality - therein being the classic juxtaposition of One versus All, for we do not know to what extent we are subject to entanglement as it's not a measurable commodity in the real world, but we do know that we are all unique. Our uniqueness is something we take for granted unless we're placing ourselves in the bowl of humanity and bemoaning it as we are wont to do.

How many people, I can ask myself now, can sit at their desk with a collared dove on one side and a tawny owl on the other, both more than happy to be there, for the owl is blind and the flightless dove has figured that out, so their relationship with each other is ambivalent while their relationship with me is mutually affable. This situation might be shared by many others with different birds, by people with animals of all kinds accompanying them on the journey without destination. But these birds beside me are unique, and that satisfies the desire to be One which humans seem to possess and other creatures seem to perceive no need of.

Our separation within the Supersystem carves out for us an illusion of grandeur, an unfortunate trait that has led to where we are now, on a planet suffering the consequences. It's okay to eat and drink the products of miserable lives and savage deaths; for some, consuming the by-products of endangered species is the best thing to do. Buying from supermarkets is a normal thing to do - every supermarket buys into the system no matter what you choose to purchase from it. They sell a lot of tuna. Most people buy milk. Coffee. Palm oil - who checks the ingredients? They sell what tastes nice, where pleasure and hunger cement an easy agreement.

No wonder we are fraught with fears of loss on a promise of infinite nothingness. What have we to look forward to, when things are unlikely to change? These relationships of ours, where are they going, when neither can see a way to put right what is so often determined to be wrong? You're more than likely asking now what the hell that has to do with quantum mechanics.